Skip to main content

Week 4: Black Lives Matter

Several readings from this week not only provided information about the Black Lives Matter Movement, but addressed the many myths and criticisms that surround it. Started in 2014 as a response to the Trayvon Martin shooting, the international movement began as a commitment to end police brutality and has grown to be an "affirmation of Black folks’ humanity, [their] contributions to this society, and [their] resilience in the face of deadly oppression." However, despite their work toward equality, many see the organization as only deepening racial tensions in the United States. "Counter-movements" like All Lives Matter and Blue Lives Matter have risen out of response or even retaliation for what they perceive is an attack on non-black citizens and specifically police officers.
 
I find it discouraging that these responses come about due to major misconceptions regarding the movement's true intentions. A quote from the Pitt article that I found particularly encapsulating described why the Black Lives Matter movement is for black lives: "because historically they have not." All lives cannot matter if black lives do not, so what the people declaring "all lives matter" don't understand is that they Black Lives Matter movement is fighting for that sentiment. However, they must do so by focusing on the black community and the injustices it continues to face. I think that Jesse Williams, who is an actor, made a compelling speech that really emphasized why the movement must focus on the black community rather than the idea that "All Lives Matter."

Black Lives Matter is accused of being disorganized and is criticized for not being more like the Civil Rights Movement of the 1960s. However, Pitt draws similarities between the two most significantly in that the Civil Rights Movement was not well-received during its time either. The majority of Americans did not approve of the peaceful protest and resistance tactics the Civil Rights Movement employed. Quite honestly though, the fact that there are still so many similarities between the two movements when they occurred nearly 50 years apart may be the most unsettling thought I had while engaging in this week's readings. Pitt talks about how both movements emphasize the humanity of black people, but my questions is why do we still need to do that 50 years after a generation of people fought incredibly hard to do so. And why are there so many misconceptions and myths surrounding a movement fighting for justice and equality? 

In this day and age, information is available in literal seconds-- so why must the Black Lives Matter movement fight so hard to get its intentions understood? I leave this week's readings with a lot of questions, mainly how can I be an ally in and out of my classroom. But also, why our country seems to have not made as much progress as a majority of Americans believe we have as a nation. 

Comments

  1. Thanks for your post Haley. It feels like we are in a time of reckoning, following Obama's presidency and this idea about the arc of history bending towards justice. For many of us (progressive white folks among others) it feels like that arc has twisted back the other way. I really appreciate your questions and I hope we will address them tomorrow in class.

    Best
    Victoria

    ReplyDelete
  2. Hi Haley,

    Thank you for your post! I'm sorry my comments are late. I really like the questions you expressed at the end of your post. Particularly the questions about social media and Black Lives Matter. You would think that with our advanced systems of social media the Purpose and goals of Black Lives Matters would be fully understood and well know by everyone. However, this isn't the case as the articles suggest. I as you, find this very interesting, but I think this fact speaks volumes. Without directly staying, this fact suggests that even the power of social media and communication isn't strong enough to change the oppressive and racists systems that are already in place. Social media and communication is only one key part to the process of changing the systems. I myself am still working on answering these questions and learning more!

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Blog Post 1

This week’s readings focusing on identity, and identity within teaching in urban contexts, proves particularly relevant to me as a white teacher who teaches a demographic composed mainly of African American and Latinx students. Kirk and Okazawa’s chapter provides a clear way of understanding the many complexities surrounding identity. They argue that “identity formation is the result of a complex interplay among individual decisions and choices, particular life events, community recognition and expectations, and societal categorization, classification, and socialization” which they further analyze on three levels: the micro, the meso, and the macro/global levels. The “micro” level of identity that the chapter discusses is one that seemed the most obvious to me throughout my whole life; it is where we “feel most comfortable as ourselves”, for this identity is does not come with the added complexity of others’ expectations or preconceived notions. I have always identified, at this level...

Culturally Responsive Pedagogy

As I engaged in each week's readings and other content, I try and make it relevant to my own practice. A lot of my posts have been relating the themes or lessons I learned to my life as a teacher. And this week, as I was relating the readings and videos to my life, I experienced a somewhat "meta" moment in that this is the feeling (or something similar to it) is what our students should be feeling in school. They should not only be actively searching for personal or life significance in things that they are doing, but we as teachers have to also ensure that they can  pull meaning from what they are learning. As a middle school math teacher, I get a lot of questions about the importance of what we are learning. A lot of "Miss, how will this actually help me in life." As a lifelong math enthusiast, it's really easy for me to just assume that people understand that math in general is just important. And I try to convey to my students that problem solving a...

Week 9: Dis/ability

Questions: 1. In the context of my own classroom, how can I be "reconceptualist" and help reframe the way my students with learning disabilities see themselves? They are often given certain treatments or pulled out of class for one reason or another, which at middle school can be an added stressor in an already hard time. Some of my students have a really healthy mindset and truly understand their learning needs, while others are much more insecure. 2. On a similar note, how can I have productive conversations with my students about our IEP students? How can we discuss their differences and what some would call "special treatment" (extra time on tests, notes on tests, extra STAR testing, extra services, etc.) while still maintaining that there is nothing wrong with them? Middle school students are already tough enough on each other and I want to be open with my class about what goes on, but also need to protect my students with IEPs. 3. I feel like this is a s...