Skip to main content

Snow Day Work (ACCIDENTALLY POSTED ON WRONG BLOG)

Hi all,

I just realized I posted this to my other class' blog (as I just posted this week's blog post to the other one as well) but I included a screenshot to prove I posted it last Tuesday!

In Dis/ability Critical Race Studies: Theorizing at the intersections of Race + Dis/ability By Subini, Connor, Beth Ferri, the authors argue through a series of tenets that race and dis/ability are strongly connected in the way that people are segregated and discriminated against. They combine "aspects of Critical Race Theory and Disability Studies" in what they call "DisCrit." The rest of the article goes into detail about each of seven tenets of DisCrit the authors propose:


  1. DisCrit focuses on ways that the forces of racism and ableism circulate interdependently, often in neutralized and invisible ways, to uphold notions of normalcy
  2. DisCrit values multidimensional identities and troubles singular notions of identity such as race or dis/ability or class or gender or sexuality, and so on
  3. DisCrit emphasizes the social constructions of race and ability and yet recognizes the material and psychological impacts of being labeled as raced or dis/abled, which sets one outside of the western cultural norms
  4. DisCrit privileges voices of marginalized populations, traditionally not acknowledged within research
  5. DisCrit considers legal and historical aspects of dis/ability and race and how both have been used separately and together to deny the rights of some citizens
  6.  DisCrit recognizes whiteness and ability as property and that gains for people labeled with dis/abillties have largely been made as the result of interest convergence of white, middle-class citizens
  7. DisCrit requires activism and supports all forms of resistance

Something that really stuck out to me throughout this reading was thinking about the historical relationship race and dis/ability have with one another. In some trainings I participated in before I became a teacher, I learned that students of color, particularly male students of color, were disproportionately labeled as LD (learning disability) and/or BD (behavior disability). And while the reading brought up points about the history of discriminatory practices against "disabled" people, it really pieced together a puzzle that wasn't fully formed in my brain yet.

A powerful quote from the reading stated that segregating students or people in general because of race is illegal, but when we do it by dis/ability, we can get away with it. And one of the main objectives of this article was to emphasize that neither institutional racism nor institutional ableism can alone explain the disproportionate amount of students of color labeled as disabled. We need to critically look at both and how they interact with one another to fully understand it.




Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Blog Post 1

This week’s readings focusing on identity, and identity within teaching in urban contexts, proves particularly relevant to me as a white teacher who teaches a demographic composed mainly of African American and Latinx students. Kirk and Okazawa’s chapter provides a clear way of understanding the many complexities surrounding identity. They argue that “identity formation is the result of a complex interplay among individual decisions and choices, particular life events, community recognition and expectations, and societal categorization, classification, and socialization” which they further analyze on three levels: the micro, the meso, and the macro/global levels. The “micro” level of identity that the chapter discusses is one that seemed the most obvious to me throughout my whole life; it is where we “feel most comfortable as ourselves”, for this identity is does not come with the added complexity of others’ expectations or preconceived notions. I have always identified, at this level...
Post a Comment
Read more

Culturally Responsive Pedagogy

As I engaged in each week's readings and other content, I try and make it relevant to my own practice. A lot of my posts have been relating the themes or lessons I learned to my life as a teacher. And this week, as I was relating the readings and videos to my life, I experienced a somewhat "meta" moment in that this is the feeling (or something similar to it) is what our students should be feeling in school. They should not only be actively searching for personal or life significance in things that they are doing, but we as teachers have to also ensure that they can  pull meaning from what they are learning. As a middle school math teacher, I get a lot of questions about the importance of what we are learning. A lot of "Miss, how will this actually help me in life." As a lifelong math enthusiast, it's really easy for me to just assume that people understand that math in general is just important. And I try to convey to my students that problem solving a...
1 comment
Read more

Week 9: Dis/ability

Questions: 1. In the context of my own classroom, how can I be "reconceptualist" and help reframe the way my students with learning disabilities see themselves? They are often given certain treatments or pulled out of class for one reason or another, which at middle school can be an added stressor in an already hard time. Some of my students have a really healthy mindset and truly understand their learning needs, while others are much more insecure. 2. On a similar note, how can I have productive conversations with my students about our IEP students? How can we discuss their differences and what some would call "special treatment" (extra time on tests, notes on tests, extra STAR testing, extra services, etc.) while still maintaining that there is nothing wrong with them? Middle school students are already tough enough on each other and I want to be open with my class about what goes on, but also need to protect my students with IEPs. 3. I feel like this is a s...
1 comment
Read more